Pages

Illinois Should Accept Federal Funds to Fill the Gap in Medicaid


We strongly encourage the General Assembly to accept new federal Medicaid funding that will be made available to Illinois in 2014 to fill a historic gap in the Medicaid program and provide health care coverage for hundreds of thousands of the lowest income uninsured Illinois residents. The measure will strengthen the financial health of our hospitals and other health care providers and boost our local economies as federal funds create jobs.

Medicaid has never covered all low-income individuals. It has always had a gap. Even if you are very poor, you do not qualify for Medicaid unless you are also elderly, disabled, pregnant, parenting or a minor child. Eliminating this gap in Medicaid opens the door for coverage to people with income under $16,000 who are ages 18-65, not officially disabled and not raising a minor child. For example, vital health coverage would be available to young adults just coming out of high school or college and starting their working lives; other young adults experiencing underemployment after a tour in the military (Illinois has 43,000 uninsured veterans); older adults whose children have passed age 18 who are not high earners; and people troubled with mental health and other issues that block their efforts at employment.

The State of Illinois, its localities, and all of the rest of us have been filling this Medicaid gap. We do it through charity care programs, safety net healthcare arrangements funded by property taxes, and state-funded human services programs that could be covered by Medicaid if the individual were eligible. The average U.S. family and their employers pay an extra $1,000 in health insurance premiums each year to compensate for health care for the uninsured. The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that total uncompensated care in Illinois will decline by approximately $953 million from 2013 - 2022. Townships and General Assistance providers will be relieved from paying for coverage of those who are uninsured and are currently ineligible for Medicaid.

The brunt of the Medicaid gap also falls on those not covered – poor health, premature death, lowered employability and productivity, lost opportunity, medical bankruptcy and more. SB 26 will allow the State of Illinois to use federal funds to close the Medicaid coverage gap, address these health inequities, and begin to address the problem of rising health care costs due to uncompensated care for the uninsured.

The Federal government will provide 100 percent of the cost of filling the Medicaid gap for the first three years ($4.6 billion for the Illinois economy), and 90 percent of the cost after that ($21 billion over the first ten years). This means nearly 20,000 new jobs, which means paychecks being spent in stores and restaurants. The tax revenue resulting from this federal investment in our state’s health care system will more than cover the state’s small financial contribution.

In announcing that she would accept the federal money to fill the Medicaid gap in her state, Arizona’s Governor Jan Brewer simply said, “I did the math”. Seven Republican governors, all at one time vocal opponents of the measure, have now joined this pragmatic and sensible chorus. It is just too obviously in the best interests of their people and their states to reject.

Health care coverage keeps people healthier and reduces overall health system costs. That’s why we, the undersigned organizations – a diverse constituency of consumers, providers, hospitals, local governments, businesses and insurance companies throughout the state – support SB 26 and urge the Illinois General Assembly to pass this bill.

Signed,

AARP Illinois
Aetna, Inc.
AIDS Foundation of Chicago
Heartland Alliance for Human Needs & Human Rights
Illinois Hospital Association Illinois Maternal and Child Health Coalition
Illinois Primary Health Care Association
Meridian Health Plan of Illinois
Sargent Shriver National Poverty Law Center
SEIU Healthcare Illinois Indiana

Dual Eligibles Next to Move into Managed Care in Illinois

On February 22, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the state of Illinois for a demonstration project that will enroll approximately 136,000 dual eligibles in northeastern and central Illinois into managed care plans. (“Dual eligibles” are individuals who have coverage through both Medicare and Medicaid.) Illinois is the fourth state to receive an MOU for this demonstration, known nationally as the Medicare Medicaid Financial Alignment Initiative (MMAI).

AgeOptions and other organizations that serve older adults have been following the development of this new project, as it will significantly affect the lives of our clients. Here is what we have learned about this new initiative from our research and communications with the entities involved, including the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services and various managed care organizations:

The MMAI project is part of a national effort to better coordinate care for dual eligible beneficiaries. Dual eligibles tend to be sicker and cost more than other Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. To address this, as part of the Affordable Care Act, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services created a Medicare-Medicaid Coordination Office (MMCO) to “make sure Medicare-Medicaid enrollees have full access to seamless, high quality health care and to make the system as cost-effective as possible.” One of the MMCO’s first projects has been working with states to implement initiatives to coordinate care for dual eligibles.

Currently, dual eligibles must navigate and manage multiple systems of coverage in order to access the health care they need (Medicare, Medicare Part D prescription drug plans, and Medicaid). This can be very complex and taxing for individuals who have multiple complex health needs. Therefore, the goals of the MMAI project are to simplify this process and provide higher quality and more coordinated care for dual eligibles.

In January 2014, dual eligibles in the greater Chicago area and parts of Central Illinois will be enrolled into managed care plans. These plans must provide care managers and other supports to coordinate their members’ care, in addition to paying for members’ medical services and long term services and supports (LTSS). In exchange, these plans will be paid a capitated rate by the state of Illinois and CMS. (“Capitated rate” means the plans will receive a flat rate for each member that they serve, instead of being paid for each individual service that a member receives.) The inclusion of long term services and supports in this project is significant, as these services may be ‘new territory’ to some managed care organizations. In addition to providing coverage for LTSS provided in long term care facilities, MMAI plans will be responsible for covering home and community based services, such as the Community Care Program. This may cause confusion for dual eligible beneficiaries who are used to receiving Community Care Program services through the existing system, so agencies working with older adults will have to provide education and assistance to help our clients understand these new changes.

Illinois has selected eight managed care plans to provide MMAI coverage. Those eight plans are:

  • Chicago area: Aetna Better Health, Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Illinois, HealthSpring, Humana, IlliniCare (Centene), and Meridian Health Plan of Illinois
  • Central Illinois: Molina Healthcare, Health Alliance
Dual eligible beneficiaries in the target counties will be able to enroll in these plans voluntarily beginning October 2013. In January 2014, the state will begin passively enrolling additional beneficiaries into the plans. This passive enrollment will be conducted in phases, so it will take about 6 months to enroll everyone who will be affected. After a beneficiary has been passively enrolled into a plan, s/he may change plans at any time and will have some ability to opt out of the program (though this opt out privilege may be limited in certain cases).

Counties that will be part of the MMAI project:
  • Greater Chicago area: Cook, DuPage, Lake, Kane, Kankakee, and Will counties
  • Central Illinois: Christian, Champaign, DeWitt, Ford, Knox, Logan, Macon, McLean, Menard, Peoria, Piatt, Sangamon, Stark, Tazewell, and Vermilion counties

For more information about the Illinois MMAI project, please see the following resources:

CMS fact sheet
Illinois Memorandum of Understanding
Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services webpage on Illinois Care Coordination Initiatives (see section on MMAI)

Written by Erin Weir, Manager of Health Care Access at AgeOptions
erin.weir@ageoptions.org

For Better Healthcare Join The Small Business Healthcare Consoritum

Our changing health care system will have a profound effect on all of us. Now that the election is over and the Supreme Court has ruled, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is not going away. It will not be repealed and it is up to us to make sure it will work for small businesses and individuals as it was intended to do.

That’s why I joined the Campaign for Better Health Care’s newly created Small Business Health Care Consortium (SBHCC). This consortium views the needs of small businesses and their employees as a top priority.

And, as a member of the Steering Committee of the SBHCC I am personally inviting you to join our network of small businesses who know that only through our collective voices that will assure that the Affordale Care Act live up to its goal of making healthcare affordable for all.

Discussions around health reform have been confusing and, sometimes, even misleading. It is the goal of the SBHCC to provide factual information about the changes that are already happening and those coming in the near future. The SBHCC discusses the benefits and opportunities of the ACA and what Illinois small businesses need to do to make sure this law will benefit them.

Many key components of the ACA are national in nature. For instance, small businesses currently providing health insurance to their employees could be eligible for a 35% tax credit. And, while employers with fewer than 50 full time employees are not required to provide health insurance, their employees can take advantage of the ACA’s benefits.

Other components will be implemented at the State level and these decisions will either enhance small businesses or provide another hurdle. One important component is that all states must implement a health insurance exchange (marketplace). These exchanges will include a rate review process with defined, easy to understand plans to consider and review side-by-side.

As small business owners we share many of the same, serious business challenges. It is my hope that you and your small business peers do want to learn more about the ACA. Let’s take this opportunity to act collectively to get control of health insurance costs and improve access to coverage. The opportunity to create positive change is now. It is about fairness and choices for small businesses. To that end I like for you to hear my own personal story about how the new healthcare law will effect me.


Howard Lee
CIO
Wirehead Technology

The Negative Impact of SMART Act Cuts


This post originally appeared as a letter from Age Options to the IL House of Representatives human Services Appropriations Committee, submitted on Feb. 20, 2013

The cuts to Medicaid that were implemented July 1, 2012 as a result of the SMART Act have had a serious negative impact on the lives of our clients. In particular, we would like to bring to your attention the hardship caused by the elimination of the Illinois Cares Rx program. Illinois Cares Rx provided critical pharmaceutical assistance to more than 160,000 older adults and people with disabilities in Illinois. Without this program, many of these individuals are struggling to pay for their medications.

Contrary to popular belief, implementation of the Affordable Care Act has not resolved the need for a state pharmaceutical assistance program. The ACA does not close the Medicare Part D “donut hole” until 2020. Further, Illinois Cares Rx provided much needed assistance with expensive Medicare Part D deductibles and copayments – the ACA does not do anything to address this.

To illustrate the difficulties that older adults are facing without this critical program, we would like to share with you the story of one of our clients. Lillian is an 89 year old resident of Berwyn, Illinois.  A widow for 53 years, Lillian worked multiple jobs to support her two children and pay off her mortgage. She had no money left over to save for retirement. Now, Lillian’s income of $1,648/month puts her above the income limits for assistance programs like Medicaid and the Part D Extra Help program, but is barely enough for Lillian to make ends meet with her expenses. She pays premiums each month for her Medicare and Part D prescription coverage. She also pays for an expensive Medicare Supplement Plan to cover her injections for macular degeneration, which cost $4,000 every two weeks, and bills for dental services out of pocket (Medicare does not provide dental coverage). In addition to all of her health care expenses, Lillian must continue to pay her utility bills, property taxes, and homeowner’s insurance. At the end of each month, Lillian has no extra money left in her bank account. In fact, lately she has had to put some of her bills onto a credit card, and then she skimps on groceries the following month to pay off the credit card bill.

Since Illinois Cares Rx was eliminated, Lillian has been unable to afford the costs of her medications. She takes nine prescription drugs every month, including two drugs that cost $70/month each in Part D copayments. Lillian has not been able to afford her three most expensive medications since January, so she has been going without them. These drugs help control Lillian’s blood pressure, cholesterol, and hypothyroidism; going without these medications is dangerous for her health and has the potential to instigate expensive emergency room or hospital care.  Unfortunately, without Illinois Cares Rx, Lillian has no other option to pay for her medications, so these are risks that she has been forced to take.

As a result of the SMART Act, thousands of older adults and people with disabilities in Illinois are in situations just like Lillian’s. They must make difficult choices every month regarding whether to pay for food, utility bills, or medications. The elimination of Illinois Cares Rx has created a tremendous financial burden for these individuals, and it is likely to create a significant financial burden for the state via costly emergency room and hospital care for individuals who cannot afford their prescription drugs.

We ask that the committee consider these burdens in future action regarding cuts to Medicaid, as well as in considering restoration of pharmaceutical assistance for older adults and people with disabilities. AgeOptions and the Illinois Association of Area Agencies on Aging fully support HB1286 (sponsored by Representative Jakobsson and cosponsored by Representatives Beiser and Burke), which would reinstate a pharmaceutical assistance program of this nature. 

IPXP To Stop Accepting Applications March 2nd

The federal office charged with implementing health care reform announced last Friday that the subsidized plans that are currently insuring more than 100,000 individuals nationwide, will be closing their doors to new enrollees months before other coverage is available on the new insurance exchanges.

Although most of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act do not become effective until January 1, 2014, the law set up interim plans, called “Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plans” for people who could not buy health insurance on the private market because of serious health conditions, including HIV. In Illinois, the state opened the Illinois Pre-Existing Insurance Plan (IPXP) in August 2010. Approximately 3000 people now have insurance though IPXP. Although those people currently enrolled in those plans will continue to have coverage until January 1, 2014, when they will be able to move to private insurance coverage, Friday’s announcement means that no new applications will be accepted after March 2, 2013.

Ann Fisher, Executive Director of the AIDS Legal Council of Chicago, explained why this is bad news for people with HIV or any other pre-existing condition that blocks them from getting private insurance. “IPXP has been an important source of health care coverage for people with HIV, including people on the AIDS Drug Assistance Program whose income climbs above 300% of the federal poverty level (about $35,000) but do not have health insurance on the job and cannot afford to pay for their medications themselves. “

The state has been able to refer those individuals to IPXP, and to help pay the IPXP premiums, so that they do not lose access to their medications. Fisher explained that IPXP was always meant to be a temporary program, set to expire once pre-existing conditions no longer prevent people from buying insurance. “But,” she added “we always assumed, perhaps naively, that IPXP would continue to accept new enrollees until very close to January 1st.” “It appears,” she added,” that IPXP is a victim of its own success. There was a limited pool of money available for the plans, and in order to make sure they can continue to pay claims of current enrollees, they now have to cut off future ones.”

The AIDS Legal Council is trying to get out the word about the closing of enrollment, and encouraging anyone who has been without insurance for at least six months to quickly apply for IPXP. ALCC is available to answer questions or assist with the enrollment process. They can be reached at 312-427-8990.

Ann Fisher
AIDS Legal Council of Chicago
ann@aidslegal.com



How To Dispose of Medical Waste? Take It Home and Frame It! (Picture)

I'm not sure what to think of this. A reader sent me a picture of their professionally framed gallbladder they saved after having it surgically removed for cholelithiasis.  As far as I'm concerned, it's medical waste.  Heck, it's  wrapped in plastic and even has a biohazard danger sticker attached to it! We can't eat or drink at the nurses station, but patients can  take their formaldehyde infested cancer causing  medical waste home with their discharge papers?  It says, "CAUTION, CONTAINS FORMALDEHYDE".  That looks like a warning to me!  I'm just waiting for the day a hospital gets sued for giving a patient cancer in the name of patient satisfaction.  Oh, wait, we do that everyday with our patient satisfaction scans.

If you ask me, this guy must have been stoned when he did this.  Or maybe he just bagged his common sense when he decided to hang toxic medical waste as a show piece in his living room.   Why not just let the  hospital dispose of it like everyone else? Let's think about the possibilities, shall we?   Perhaps he's part of a growing movement of environmentalists trying to reduce their carbon foot print by  keeping their medical waste from ending up in the local landfill.    I don't know how common it is for people to request their own body parts or other waste after surgery. For some folks, saving their surgical waste might be a fetish.  Remember, there are  folks who like to cut off their balls.   Heck, this might even be a reality TV series some day.   For others, it might be the cool factor. And for others yet, they may want to keep their body parts for  religious reasons.

I heard a story once about an elderly woman who had to have both of her legs amputated after a freak car accident.  She requested both her legs be given back to her after surgery so they could be placed in the coffin with her body upon her death.   Where do you store human legs while waiting to die? Why, with the leg-of-lamb, of course.  What was the reason for wanting to keep the legs?  She wanted to make sure she had a leg up on everyone once she got into Heaven.  Personally,  I suspect she wanted to make one of those leg lamps from the movie A Christmas Story.

As for our guy with the gallbladder, whatever his motivation for saving his toxic organic waste, you have to admire him for being bold.  How many of you would frame your sack for all your friends and family to see? 



This post is for entertainment purposes only and likely contains humor only understood by those in a health care profession. Read at your own risk.

IRS Issues Guidance on Health Insurance Premium Tax Credit - Clarification

The IRS issued a final regulations on when an employer-sponsored plan is considered "affordable" for an individual related to the employee for purposes of eligibility for a premium tax credit. Under Health Care Reform, employees may be eligible for a premium tax credit to purchase health insurance through the future health insurance exchanges if, among other reasons, the employer plan is deemed unaffordable.

The final regulations clarify that for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2015, an eligible employer-sponsored plan is affordable for related individuals if the portion of the annual premium the employee must pay for self-only coverage does not exceed 9.5% of the taxpayer's household income.

An employer plan will be affordable for family members if the cost of self-only coverage does not exceed 9.5% of the employee's household income. In other words, for purposes of whether family members are eligible for tax credits, the affordability of family coverage is not taken into account; all that matters is that the cost of self-only coverage is affordable to the employee

For purposes of applying the affordability exemption from the individual mandate in the case of related individuals, the required contribution is based on the premium the employee would pay for employer-sponsored family coverage.

For an employee eligible under an employer plan, affordability (for individual mandate exemption purposes) will be based on whether the cost of self-only coverage exceeds 8% of the employee's household income. For a related individual (such as a spouse or child), however, affordability for this purpose will be based on whether the cost of family coverage exceeds 8% of household income. Under these rules, members of an employee's family may qualify for an individual mandate exemption, even though the offer of affordable employer coverage to the employee would require the employee to enroll or risk paying a penalty.

These final regulations apply to taxable years ending after December 31, 2013.

For a copy of the final regulations, please click here.

This post originally appeared on February 5, 2013, on the Robert Slayton & Associates, Inc. blog. By Larry Grudzien, Attorney-At-Law

The HHS Secretary Visits Chicago


This week, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius visited Chicago to speak about the Illinois Health Insurance Marketplace, a key provision of the Affordable Care Act.

Secretary Sebelius, accompanied by Governor Pat Quinn, announced on Wednesday that the Illinois Blueprint Application for a State-Partnership health exchange had been accepted by the federal government. The exchange will run as a federal-state partnership model until 2015, when the state may take over operations, depending on the State Legislature’s ability to pass a state exchange bill. Enrollment in the partnership exchange/marketplace opens in October, only eight months (229 days!) away.

Secretary Sebelius speaks to a full house at the Chicago Cultural Center

On Thursday, Sec. Sebelius spoke at the Chicago Cultural Center. Preceding her was Bechara Choucair, Commissioner of the Chicago Department of Public Health, who presented an overview of the Healthy Chicago program and its impact thus far. Sebelius delivered a call to action to those in attendance, citing the need for affordable, accessible health insurance for all as a crucial step in the national public health strategy. With only eight months before the state health marketplace is open for enrollment, and ten months before it is fully operational, promoting awareness of the health insurance exchange is the focus of HHS. 

Baby Lion Cubs Playing at Omaha Henry Doorly Zoo (Picture/Video)

Mrs Happy and I took a stroll through the Omaha Henry Doorly Zoo yesterday and had an opportunity to check out the five new baby lion cubs on exhibit in the Cat Complex.  These newborn kitties were born December 29th, 2012.  These six week old cubs were so fun to watch with their playful innocence.  It's hard to imagine how ferocious they  may be become  when they're all grown up.  We stood there with a bunch of moms and dads and kids watching them roll around and claw at each other.

The adult lions were off in the corner doing their own thing.  One female lion would occasional peak over and check on things. It was pretty cute to watch.  Here's a YouTube video below  I took of the five baby cubs running around and playing while two female adult lions look on.  I'm not sure which is the mother or if these cubs will have a two mommy family.

I wonder what it would be like to be the lions behind the glass staring back at all the humans gawcking at you.  Do you ever wonder what they're thinking?  Perhaps, "Leave me alone"?  Or, "There's nothing going on here.  Feel free to go checkout the monkeys".  We'll have to make a special trip back to the Omaha Zoo to check up on these little guys.



On a more serious note, I am concerned one of the adult males ate a zookeeper . I was able to snap an incredibly close up picture of the male lion with its big mane when it came right up to the glass.  I've never had such an amazing close encounter with a lion.  I was surprised at how content it was.



Until it turned around and I realized there was a hand sticking out of its bottom end. We were all petrified to see such a horrible thing. I'm shocked none of this has made the national news. I don't know who it was.  I just wish I could have lend him a hand. But it was too late.




Some of this post is for entertainment purposes only and likely contains humor only understood by people with a sense of humor. Read at your own risk.

Sterile Water Irrigation Denied By Insurance. Patient Not Sterile Enough.

I feel bad for our patients.   Insurance economic algorithms are defining  the patient and doctor experience regardless of situations unique to the patient experience.  If our recommendations as physicians or your needs as a patient do not comply with your insurance company's economic algorithms, you and your  physician will likely get denial of care letters.  That means hours of headaches and delayed therapy for you and hours of headaches and uncompensated expenses for your physician's office in communication with your insurance company.  It is no wonder many offices have started charging patients for their busy work. 

That denial of care can come in the way of preauthorization headaches.   I experienced that tragedy while trying to authorize a lidoderm patch for a patient of mine that was getting  great pain relief in the hospital.   That patient was denied coverage for the patch as an outpatient.   We too have experienced the frustration.  Mrs Happy was recently at Walmart.  She learned  our Blue Cross Blue Shield  insurance would not authorize coverage   on her medication refill required for our 9 week baby pregnancy related care last week because she was two days early to pick up the prescription..   That's right folks.  BCBS algorithms are denying care to our unborn baby because Mrs Happy is too compliant with her therapy.

CMS would be thrilled at Mrs Happy's actions!    They actually have a program in place to track how compliant you are with your medication adherence.  You think big brother isn't watching?  Think again.  This information will be used against you when the time is right.  Follow this link for the crazy details. 

If you need outpatient radiology imaging such as MRI or CT or ultrasound, more than likely your insurance company will require your physician's office  to obtain preauthorization.  Every insurance company is different.  One algorithm may allow the scan while another may deny it.  That formula will change from year to year and from company to company.    Some medications will be covered, some will not.  It changes from year to year and from company to company.

Medicare wants hospitals to  make our patients happy.  They care so much about our patient's hospital experience that they are withholding money from  hospitals that don't win the patient satisfaction game.  We could spend hundreds of thousands of dollars a year training staff to be nice, but if a physician writes an order for that Lidoderm patch and the patient can't fill it, they aren't going to care about being AIDETized.

Then there's this patient below.  They  most certainly aren't going to give my hospital glowing patient satisfaction scores after experiencing a devastating denial of payment on their sterile water irrigation solution script.  The insurance company said it wasn't on their formulary.  More likely, I suspect the algorithm denied payment because the patient wasn't sterile enough to benefit from sterile irrigation. 

The same insurance company that will pay $100,000 for seven smoking related COPD readmissions  has decided to deny their patient insurance benefits to sterile water. In fact, I guarantee if this patient came to the ER saying they needed to be admitted because they couldn't get access to sterile water, I would bring them in under observation care just for spite.  At least then they could get their sterile water irrigation flushes with a diagnosis of rule out lack of access to sterile water irrigation flushes and they will pay  $3000 a day for the right to do so and I will get paid form my highly complex level 3 observation history and physical. 

Denying sterile water irrigation flushes.  This is what our life as doctors and patients have become.  And it's only going to get worse from here. America has spoken.  They are getting what they asked for.  Algorithms rule our health care decisions.  More and more decisions are going to be made based on computer models and actuaries.  ObamaCare says we can't deny care based on preexisting conditions.  From where I'm sitting, there's plenty of denying going on.   One solution is to stay healthy, exercise, don't smoke and hopefully you can live a long and happy life away from this madness.  For the rest of you, you had better plan on saving lots of money to pay your physicians extra.   It's only a matter of time before patients who can afford to pay extra do and those that can't  will be denied.



This post is for entertainment purposes only and likely contains humor only understood by those in a health care profession. Read at your own risk.

Navigators, Assisters, and Counselors, Oh My!

By now we know that upwards of 30 million Americans will have new, more affordable health coverage options available to them by January 1, 2014. But what many don’t realize is how incredibly difficult it can be to understand and choose the right health insurance on your own.

The Wizard of Oz’s Dorothy had guides along the way, and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) provides some as well – hopefully, with fewer pitfalls. But not everyone can counsel people about health insurance. There are complex public and private systems to navigate, and most people who will likely get insurance in the new Health Insurance Exchanges, or Marketplaces, will be more racially diverse, less educated, and earn lower income than people in private insurance now. Most will have a high school education or less, and as many as one in four speak a language other than English at home. So it matters that the people who guide consumers along the path to coverage are trusted members of the community and understand their circumstances.

Luckily, the ACA provides different options for guides along yellow brick road.

Navigators are outlined in the ACA as helpers for people to enroll in coverage through the Exchange, and refer or assist with Medicaid enrollment. Navigators are funded through Exchanges, and regulations from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) are clear that anyone who gets payments from insurance companies cannot be a Navigator. Navigators also must meet cultural competency standards and go through training and certification. States running their own Exchanges are developing Navigator programs now and must fund these with state Exchange dollars. For Federal Exchanges and Partnership Exchanges, HHS has said that it will fund Navigators directly through an upcoming RFP process. Be on the lookout for this announcement in the next few weeks.

To add even more help on the ground, HHS recently outlined in regulations another program,Assisters (or, In-Person Assistance). Like Navigators, Assisters must meet training and conflict of interest standards. They could fill in gaps in areas that need more enrollment assistance, or provide outreach and education about the ACA’s new options. Funding for Assisters is a key difference from Navigators. States running Exchanges or opting for the Consumer Assistance Partnership can apply for funds for Assisters through their Exchange Establishment grants. A number of states are applying now for these funds. Unfortunately, Assisters currently are not an option for Federal Exchanges.

And when you thought there were enough new health-related terms, HHS regulations added yet another helper to enroll people, Certified Application Counselors. Every Exchange must have a Certified Application Counselor program, with similar training and privacy standards as Navigators and Assisters. A difference in this program is that there is no funding mechanism. It is unclear who will serve this role – although the regulation suggests it could be community-based organizations or health care providers. Stay tuned for further clarification on this new option.

But even these multiple types of help will not be enough to spread the word about the ACA. Helping people understand and choose the right health plan, especially given the amount of misinformation in the media and elsewhere, is going to be a huge task. Nevertheless, these resources in the ACA provide a foundation to start building greater understanding of health care options to get people into the right coverage.


This post originally appeared on Health Policy Hub's the Community Catalyst Blog
Written by Christine Barber, Senior Policy Analyst

Why Obamacare will ignite your startup life

This post originally appeared on Crain's Chicago Business.
Written by Coco Soodek
Obamacare is going to set you free to pursue your startup dreams. Why? Because finally you won't be chained to a big company for your health insurance.

If you want affordable, reliable health insurance in America, you have had to be over 65 so you can get Medicare, work for the government or work for a big company. That's because big companies, government and Medicare have enough people in their plans to improve the insurance companies' odds of making money. Small companies and solopreneurs don't, so their insurance rates are high or they can't get coverage at all.

As a result, business owners often don't have health insurance. Only 19 percent of business owners get insurance through their own companies. And 25 percent of small-business owners don't even have health insurance, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

The stakes of not having health insurance are catastrophic. You may not be able to get health care if you get sick or are in an accident. That means you or your loved one could die or suffer. If you do get care, the bills may drive you into bankruptcy — half of all personal bankruptcies result from huge medical bills. We're not talking people who live above their means. We're talking people who went to the doctor to stay alive until they cry uncle.

So, leaving your big employer to start your own business can be a life-or-death decision. If you have a spouse or kids, the decision could be downright stupid. So, you stay with your big company, you follow its rules and hope for good fortune from the layoff gods. It's a terrible, ugly, stupid, myopic system and it deserves to die an unpaid-for death.

Obamacare is coming. Imperfect, complicated, rough on midsize companies, sure. But it's the grace of God for your startup hopes. For the first time in American history, your health insurance is going to get unhitched from your oversized, shuffling, bureaucratic employer. You're going to be able to visit a virtual supermarket of health insurance plans and pick the plan you want, which probably won't cover less than 60 percent of your health costs. That supermarket of health insurance is going to pool you with thousands of others to improve the odds that the insurer will make money.

If you have a company of 25 employees or fewer, and you pay half of the premiums for your employees, you can deduct 35 to 50 percent of the premiums. If you make less than $92,000-ish for a family of four, you could get government help to buy your health insurance at the supermarket. Freeloaders on the health care system have to pay up, liberating the rest of us from paying for their emergencies and lowering costs. (If you're one of those freeloaders, you have it coming.) You never have to go back to work for someone just to get insurance.

Obamacare will be the difference that creates entrepreneurs out of thousands of people like you. Scholars have known for years that the lack of affordable, reliable or even available health insurance keeps people chained to their employers. In fact, when individual states create avenues for people to get affordable health insurance, the number of entrepreneurs increases. When New Jersey reformed its health insurance laws to create markets for individual insurance and guaranteed policy renewals and limited exclusions for pre-existing conditions, entrepreneurial activity soared. And so it will in the rest of the country. Because the United States is — by history and by nature — a land of shopkeepers, not shop workers. We dream, innovate, strike out, fail, try again and prosper. The health insurance market has incentivized people to live at the mercy of someone else's vision. Obamacare is going to tilt the market back to center.


Read more here. 
Stay on top of Chicago business with our free daily e-newsletters

External Condom Catheters For Men Reviewed: Girth and Length Analysis!

Placement of a urinary bladder catheter comes with the territory for many hospitalized patients.  Indwelling Foley catheters are often inserted through the urethra and into the bladder of men and women.   An internal ballon is then expanded to prevent the catheter from falling out.  These catheters have an appropriate role in the management of some hospitalized patients.  Bladder outlet obstruction and urinary retention require internal bladder catheters to manage the problem.   Sometimes the catheter is the cause of the problem.   Here is an example of bilateral hydronephrosis from a Foley catheter.

Too often, hospitalized patients get indwelling urinary catheters ordered out of convenience, ignorance or because that's the way the doctor has always practiced.  Patients or nurses may request them and doctors may order them for any number of reasons, some appropriate, some not.  Far too often, these catheters get placed and forgotten.  Many hospitals have implemented policies and procedures to reduce the incidence of prolonged catheter placement and the complications that are sure to follow.  The best way to prevent a complication of an indwelling catheter is not to place one.  Catheter related infections and hematuria due to catheter trauma are just two of the many bad outcomes.

What can hospitals do to limit complications from internal bladder catheters?  Some hospitals think  outside the box and use external catheters instead.    For men, these external catheters are called condom catheters.  Don't worry, I have verified  these condom catheters are Catholic compliant.    They are placed just like a condom.   No more concerns about bladder infections.  No more concerns about  traumatic clots inside the bladder.  No more concerns about dirty old men having unprotected sex in the hospital.  Just place a condom catheter on them and be done with it.  Or at least until they pull it off 32 times a day and ask the nurse  for help putting it back on.   I guess Uncle Eddie isn't so demented after all.  

How do these condom catheters work?  What about their length?  What about their girth?  Surely, one size does not fit all.    So many questions, yet so few answers.  I did what any hospitalist would do when they have free time on their hands.  I commandeered the condom catheter directions for my review.   Boy, was that a shocker.  These things are definitely not one size fits all.  Below are a couple of pictures from the folding insert, complete with directions, a 20 cm ruler (8 inches) and a girth sizing guide for  the Coloplast Conveen® Optima external condom catheter.   For best results, I suggest you follow their advice.  I have provided a summary of their recommendations here as a public service announcement.  If you ever find yourself hospitalized and need a urine capturing device, and a nurse calls you sport, I recommend you give them all zeros on your patient satisfaction scores.

Step 1  Prepare Skin: Make sure the skin is clean and dry, free from oils and moisturizers.  A protectant wipe may be used.  If necessary, trim pubic hair.  
    • WOW!  I don't know how many nurses or men can ever get past step one.  A clean and dry penis in a 90 year old nursing home patient? Oils and moisturizers?  What kind of nursing how is THAT guy staying in.  And trimming the pubic hair?  I'm sure nurses didn't graduate from nursing school with pubic hair trimmer expert in their job description.  Certainly, hospitals MUST be considering a pubic hair trim as an add on amenity worthy of extra revenue.
Step 2  Size:  Use sizing guide to measure circumference and length to determine correct catheter.  Four circumference sizes are available in STANDARD length and four circumferences sizes in SPORT length for short/retracted shafts.
    • WOW!  Call me crazy, but I'm certain becoming an expert in measuring penis girth was not an elective in nursing school.  It's great that Coloplast has the girth and length measuring device available, but I think their good intentions may have unintended consequences.    I can see it now, patient and nurse arguing over which girth size to pick. Don't even think about telling him he's a sport.  You'll crush his manhood and force me to consult a psychiatrist for suicidal thoughts. Way to go Coloplast.  Maybe these condom catheters aren't such a great idea.  "Oh, to be 20 again..."



Step 3  Open it.  Ok, easy enough.  

Step 4  Apply the Catheter:  Place the catheter on the head of the penis, keeping a 1/4 to 3/4 inch gap between the penis and the outlet tube.  Hold the catheter in place with one hand, while gripping the double strip pull tab with the other.  Then pull the double strip pull-tab, slowly un-rolling the catheter towards the base of the penis.  Gently squeeze the catheter around the shaft of the penis for a few seconds to ensure adhesion.  
    • OH MY!  There goes my length of stay and 30 day readmission rate.  With service like this, my patients will never want to leave the hospital.  
Step 5  Leg Bag:  Connect the catheter to the urine bag.  

Step 6  Removal:  Catheter should be exchanged daily.
    • Perform steps 1-5 daily to ensure great patient satisfaction scores! Expect longer lengths of stays and higher 30 day readmission rates as we trade excellence in one measured outcome for another.
I do have one suggestion for the folks over at Coloplast.  I recommend you offer these condom catheters in an assortment of colors and designs.  Think about it.   How many crazy old men love their hunting.  Camouflage condom catheters to the rescue.  Since they haven't felt anything in the last 20 years, you might as well help them make it disappear.  Favorite football team?  The Chargers?  The Jets?  The Giants?  The Packers?  Come on.  Offering an upgraded football catheter is a gold mine for you and your client hospital's amenity of services.   Keep your marketing team active and we'll all get to  WIN-WIN.  Now, please enjoy this original Happy Hospitalist ecard, part of a collection of hundreds on Pinterest.

"Please stop flashing your penis at me.  I'm not impressed.  Except maybe like 1% of the time."

Penis Flashing Ecard Nursing HumorMedical Humor Store Banner

To view this card at The Happy Hospitalist Medical Humor store, turn off the "safe filter" on the left hand side" at the store landing page linked above.



Some of this post is for entertainment purposes only and likely contains humor only understood by those with a sense of humor. Read at your own risk.


Postingan Lebih Baru Postingan Lama Beranda